skip through navigation (Access Key = S ) Jump to Accessibility Information (Access Key = 0 ) Jump to Home Page (Access Key = 1 ) Jump to News (Access Key = 2 ) Jump to Site Map (Access Key = 3 ) Jump to Search Box (Access Key = 4 ) Jump to Frequently Asked Questions (Access Key = 5 ) Jump to Help Page (Access Key = 6 ) Jump to Complaints (Access Key = 7 ) Jump to Terms and Conditions (Access Key = 8 ) Jump to Feedback Form (Access Key = 9 ) Jump to content (Access Key = N ) Jump to Business and Advice  (Access Key = B ) Jump to Leisure and Culture  (Access Key = C ) Jump to Council and Community Diary (Access Key = M ) Jump to Environment and Planning (Access Key = V ) Jump to Community and Learning (Access Key = G ) Jump to Do It Online (Access Key = O ) Jump to Children and Young  People (Access Key = P ) Jump to A to Z Services (Access Key = T ) Jump to Your Council (Access Key = Y ) Jump to A too Z site Index (Access Key = Z ) jump to Read Speaker functionality (Access Key = L) Jump to Printer Friendly Version (Access Key = F) Jump to Text Only (Access Key = J) Jump to Change Contrast (Access Key = K)
Riverside Works Appeal
Riverside Works, Fordbridge Road, Sunbury on Thames, TW16 6AP

The Planning Inspector has dismissed all three appeals for the Environment Agency (EA) site known as Riverside Works in Sunbury.  The first appeal was for the redevelopment of the site for 88 residential properties, plus open space on the mainland site.  The second two related to applications for a new workshop and ancillary facilities on the island site.  Residents attended throughout the public inquiry which was held in November/December 2010.  The planning committee had unanimously refused planning permission back in November 2009.

The Inspector raised significant concerns about all three proposals.  The housing scheme was dismissed for the following reasons:
  • It failed to deliver a high quality layout, resulting in a cramped layout with inappropriate design
  • The riverside properties would have an adverse impact on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • It would have an adverse impact on protected species (bats and reptiles)
The workshop scheme was dismissed for the following reasons:
  • No very special circumstances had been shown to allow development in the Green Belt
  • It would have an adverse impact on protected species (bats and reptiles)
The EA will need to consider the implications of the decision, but it is open to them to come forward with a revised scheme.  However, this would need to address all of the concerns raised by the Inspector.  Any future application would be subject to public consultation in the usual way.

Inspector's Report on the Appeal Decision